Research article
Characteristic of chemical and sensory of stick product which fortified with yellowfin tuna flour
Highlights
Generate: Datamuse by AXIOS AI.
Abstract
Snack is defined as food consumed between regular meals which are liked by all people, so it becomes a habit to get rid of hunger before the main meal. Stick is a long flat snack, has a savory taste and crunchy, made from a mixture of flour, fat, eggs and water, which is processed by frying or baking. Fish sticks are processed snacks made from a mixture of flour, seasoning, margarine, eggs and water and additional fish meat or fish flour, then formed to flat shapes with a length of ± 6-7 cm and frying with oil at 170 °C till golden yellow This study aims to determined the chemical characteristics and evaluation of sensory fish sticks fortified with yellowfin tuna flour. The results of this study can be concluded that the percentage of yellowfin fish flour fortified on stick product effected to the chemical characteristics of parameters moisture contents (2.76 - 3.63%), ash (2.66 - 5.02%), fat (16.15 - 22.55%) protein (7.39 - 11.72%), and carbohydrates (57.94 - 70.17%) produced by yellowfin fish sticks. Fortification of yellowfin tuna flour has an effected on the sensory characteristics of fish sticks on the attributes of aroma and taste, while not affecting the appearance and texture attributes.
Keywords
Introduction
Section snippets
Material and Methods
Not found Material and Methods from fulltext PDF for this article.
Results
Not found Results from fulltext PDF for this article.
Discussion
Not found Discussion from fulltext PDF for this article.
Conclusions
Not found Conclusions from fulltext PDF for this article.
Acknowledgment
Not found Acknowledgment from fulltext PDF for this article.
Declarations
License and permission
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Publisher's Note
Sangia Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
No CRediT authorship contribution statement required for this article.
Ethical approval acknowledgements
No ethical approval required for this article.
Competing interest
No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.
Supplementary files
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References (1)
Actia. 2001. Sensory Evaluation - Guide of Good Practise. Actia and Actia Centre. Paris. France.
Amrullah WS. 2015. Mutu Organoleptik dan Kimiawi Stik Rumput Laut Kappaphycus alvarezii dengan Fortifikasi Tepung Udang Rebon (Mysis sp.). [artikel jurnal]. Gorontalo (ID): Jurusan Teknologi Hasil Perairan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.
Barbosa-Canovas GV. 2009. Food Engineering Vol. II. Food Texture-Sensory Evaluation Costell E, Duran L. Encyclopedia of Life Support System. EOLLS Publisher co. Ltd. Oxford UK.
Chaplin K, Smith AP. 2011. Defenitions and Preception of Snacking.Current Topics in Nutraceutical Research.Vol. 9 (1) p. 53-59.
Fatkurahman R, Atmaka W, Basito. 2012. Karakteristik Sensoris dan Sifat Fisikokimia Cookies dengan Subtitusi Bekatul Beras Hitam (Oryza sativa L.) dan tepung Jagung (Zea mays L.). Jurnal Teknosains Pangan 1(1) p. 49 –
Fitri N, Purwani E. 2017. Pengaruh Subtitusi Tepung Ikan Kembung (Rastrelliger brachysoma) Terhadap Kadar Protein dan Daya Terima Biskuit. Seminar Nasional Gizi 2017 Program Studi Ilmu Gizi UMS “Strategi Optimasi Tumbuh Kembang Anak” p. 139-151.
Hadiwiyoto S. 1993. Teknologi Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian. Yogyakarta (ID): UGM.
Handoyo WT, Assadad L. 2016. Karakteristik Proses Produksi dan Kualitas Tepung Ikan di Beberapa Pengolahan Ikan Skala Kecil.Seminar Nasional Tahun XIII Hasil Penelitian Perikanan dan Kelautan. Semnas UGM Pasca Panen (pPB-Q3) p. 197-204
Listiana L. 2016. Pengaruh Subsitusi Tepung Ikan Tongkol Terhadap Kadar Protein, Kekerasan dan Daya Terima Biskuit. Skripsi Ilmu Gizi Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Lusas ED. 2002. Snack Food Processing: Chapter 1. Overview.By.Lusas RW and Rooney LW.Boca Raton London New York Washington DC. p. 3-27
Nasution A. 1980. Metode Penilaian Cita Rasa I. Bogor (ID): Departemen Ilmu Kesejahteraan Keluarga,Fakultas Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Peranginangin R, Nurhayati. Penelitian Fortifikasi Kalsium Yang Diekstraksi Dari Tulang Ikan Tuna Dalam Produk Camilan Ikan. Prosiding seminar nasional inovasi teknologi : pengolahan produk dan bioteknologi kelautan dan perikanan III. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Balai Besar Riset Pengolahan Produk dan Bioteknologi KP. p. 97-104 ISBN 978-602-96199-6-6 Jakarta
Setyaningsih D, Apriyantono A, Sari MP. 2010. Analisa Sensori Industri Pangan dan Agro. IPB Press, Bogor
Siswanti, Agnesia PY, Katri A RB. 2017. Pemanfaatan Daging dan Tulang Ikan Kembung (Rastrelliger kanagurta) dalam Pembuatan Camilan Stik.Jurnal Teknologi Hasil Pertanian.Vol. X (1) p. 40-49.
SNI. 2000. SNI 01-2886-2015. Makanan Ringan Ekstrudat. ICS.67.180.20 Badan Standar Nasional Indonesia. Penebar Swadaya Jakarta.
SNI. 2006. SNI 01-2346-2006 Petunjuk Pengujian Organoleptik dan Sensorik. Badan Standar Nasional Indonesia. Penebar Swadaya Jakarta.
SNI. 2006. SNI: 01-2354.1-2006. Cara Uji Kimia Bagian 1: Penentuan Kadar Abu Pada Produk Perikanan. ICS. 67.120.30 Badan Standar Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta.
SNI. 2006. SNI: 01-2354.2-2006. Cara Uji Kimia Bagian 2: Penentuan Kadar Air Pada Produk Perikanan. ICS. 67.120.30 Badan Standar Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta
Tangke U., 2014. Parameter populasi dan tingkat eksploitasi ikan tongkol (Euthynnus affinis) di perairan Pulau Morotai. Agrikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agribisnis dan Perikanan. 7(1):74–81. DOI: 10.29239/j.agrikan.7.1.74-81.
Tangke U., Deni S., & Aunaka A., 2018a. The Influence of Using Bait Types to the Number and Composition of Fishing Traps Catch in South Ternate Waters. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 175(1):12231. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012231.
Tangke U., Mallawa A., & Zainuddin M., 2011. Analisis hubungan karakteristik oseanografi dan hasil tangkapan yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) di perairan Laut Banda. Agrikan: Jurnal Agribisnis dan Perikanan. 4(2):1–14. DOI: 10.29239/j.agrikan.4.2.1-14.
Tangke U., Sangadji I., Rochmady R., & Susiana S., 2018b. A population dynamic aspect of Selaroides leptolepis in the coastal waters of South Ternate Island, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux. 11(4):1334–1342.
Bibliographic Information
Cite this article as:
-
Submitted
10 September 2019 -
Revised
23 October 2019 -
Accepted
7 November 2019 -
Published
7 November 2019 -
Version of record
5 November 2020 -
Issue date
7 October 2019
-
Discipline(s)
Fisheries; Fisheries Science
Copyright
VanessaNatalie JaneLekahena, GS Profile - Sinta Profile - Scopus Profile
. Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara, Ternate, Indonesia.
Orcid Profile
Google Scholar Profile Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Sangia Research Media and Publishing. Production and hosting by Sangia (SRM™). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.