Akuatikisle: Jurnal Akuakultur, Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil
Full Length Article
Growth and survival of post larvae of tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon Fabr.) through the administration of probiotics with different doses
Highlights
Generate: Datamuse by AXIOS AI.
Abstract
One of the factors that affect the growth of tiger shrimp is the quality of feed. Nutrient content in feed such as protein, carbohydrate and fat, generally used as a parameter of feed quality. Feed consumed by shrimp is not all digested, one of which depends on the enzymatic ability of the shrimp digestive tract. The use of probiotic bacteria in addition to having the ability to reduce colonies, inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, and neutralize water quality, probiotic bacteria can help digestibility of the intestine. The aim of this research is to know the growth and survival of post larvae of shrimp (Penaeus monodon Fabr.) Through the provision of probiotics with different doses. The research was conducted at Balai Fish Fishing Hall of Muna Regency, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Post larva shrimp tiger (PL-20) of 120 tails, maintained for 28 days. The tested treatment was probiotic dose 5 ml (treatment A), dose 10 ml treatment B), dose 15 ml (treatment C), and without probiotics (control). Probiotics are given every 7 days on water maintenance media using a pipette (0.5-20 ml scale). Weighing results showed relatively high post-larva shrimp larvae growth of 400.00% (treatment B); 291.67% (treatment C); of 233.33% (treatment A) and equal to 58.33% (Control). Variation analysis result showed that giving of probiotic with different dose gave real effect (P<0,01) to relative growth of postlarva prawn weights (P. monodon Fabr.). Provision of probiotics has no significant effect on postlarva tiger prawn survival rate (P. monodon Fabr.). The survival rate of post larvae of tiger shrimp during the study was in the range 66.67-83.33%.
Keywords
Introduction
Section snippets
Material and Methods
Not found Material and Methods from fulltext PDF for this article.
Results
Not found Results from fulltext PDF for this article.
Discussion
Not found Discussion from fulltext PDF for this article.
Conclusions
Not found Conclusions from fulltext PDF for this article.
Acknowledgment
Not found Acknowledgment from fulltext PDF for this article.
Funding Information
Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha
Declarations
License and permission
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Publisher's Note
Sangia Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
No CRediT authorship contribution statement required for this article.
Ethical approval acknowledgements
No ethical approval required for this article.
Competing interest
No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.
Supplementary files
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References (1)
Afrilasari W., Widanarni, & Meryandini A. 2016. Effect of Probiotic Bacillus megaterium PTB 1.4 on the Population of Intestinal Microflora, Digestive Enzyme Activity and the Growth of Catfish (Clarias sp.). HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 23(4):168-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.hjb.2016.12.005. Vew Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Amin M., & Mansyur A. 2010. Pertumbuhan plankton pada aplikasi probiotik dalam pemeliharaan udang windu (Penaeus monodon Fabricius) di bak terkontrol. In: Prosiding Forum Inovasi Teknologi Akuakultur, pp. 261-268. [Google Scholar]
Amin M., & Mansyur A. 2012. Keragaman plankton pada budidaya vanname (Litopenaeus vannamei) pola semi-intensif dengan pergiliran pakan protein berbeda. In: Prosiding Indoaqua-Forum Inovasi Teknologi Akuakultur, pp. 495-502. [Google Scholar]
Arief I.I., Jenie B.S.L., Astawan M., & Witarto A.B. 2010. Efektivitas Probiotik Lactobacillus plantarum 2C12 dan Lactobacillus acidophilus 2B4 Sebagai Pencegah Diare pada Tikus Percobaan. Media Peternakan, 33(3):137-143. DOI: 10.5398/medpet.2010.33.3.137. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Boyd C.E. 1982. Water quality management for pond fish culture. cod. Water quality management for pond fish culture. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co. Amsterdam. 318 p. [Google Scholar]
Brito L.O., Arana L.A.V. Soares R.B., Severi W., Miranda R.H., da Silva S.M.B.C., Coimbra M.R.M., & Gálvez A.O. 2014. Water quality, phytoplankton composition and growth of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) in an integrated biofloc system with Gracilaria birdiae (Greville) and Gracilaria domingensis (Kutzing). Aquaculture International, 22(5):1649-1664. DOI: 10.1007/s10499-014-9771-9. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Budiardi T., Muluk C., Widigdo B., Praptokardiyo K., & Soedharma D. 2008. Tingkat pemanfaatan pakan dan kelayakan kualitas air serta estimasi pertumbuhan dan produksi udang vaname (Litopenaeus vannamei, Boone 1931) pada sistem intensif. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Perairan dan Perikanan Indonesia, 15(2):109-116. [Google Scholar]
Darmadi & Ismail A. 1993. Tinjauan Beberapa Faktor Penyebab Kegagalan Usaha Budidaya Udang di Tambak. In: Seminar Sehari Hasil Penelitian. Sub Balai Perikanan Budidaya Pantai, Bojonegoro. Serang.
Effendie M.I. 1997. Biologi Perikanan. Yayasan Pustaka Nusatama. Yogyakarta. 163 p.
Ekawati A.W., Rustidja, Marsoedi, & Maheno. 1995. Studi Tentang Pertumbuhan Udang Windu (Penaeus monodan Fab.) Pada Tambak Tradisional Plus di Sidoharjo Jawa Timur. In: Buletin Ilmiah Perikanan Edisi V, Fakultas Perikanan Universitas Brawijaya Malang. Malang.
Fast A.W. & Lester L.J. 1992. Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices Development in Aquaculture and Fisheries Sciences. Fast A.W. & Lester L.J. (eds.), Volume 23 ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam. 862 p. ISBN: 9781483291048. [Google Scholar]
Feliatra, Efendi I., & Suryadi E. 2004. Isolasi dan identifikasi bakteri probiotik dari Ikan Kerapu Macan (Ephinephelus fuscogatus) dalam upaya efisiensi pakan ikan. Jurnal Natur Indonesia, 6(2):75-80. [Google Scholar]
Gunarto G., Tangko A.M., Tampangallo B.R., & Muliani M. 2016. Budidaya Udang Windu (Penaeus monodon) di Tambak dengan Penambahan Probiotik. Jurnal Riset Akuakultur, 1(3):303-313. DOI: 10.15578/JRA.1.3.2006.303-313. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Gunarto & Hendrajat E.A. 2008. Budidaya Udang Vanamei, Litopenaeus vannamei Pola Semi-Intensif dengan Aplikasi Beberapa Jenis Probiotik Komersial. Journal Riset Akuakultur, 3(3):339-349. DOI: 10.15578/JRA.3.3.2008.339-349. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Gunarto, Mansyur A., & Muliani. 2009. Aplikasi dosis fermentasi probiotik berbeda pada budidaya udang vaname (Litopenaeus vannamei) pola intensif. Jurnal Riset Akuakultur, 4(2):241-255. [Google Scholar]
Hendradjat E.A., & Mangampa M. 2016. Pertumbuhan dan sintasan udang vannamei pola tradisional plus dengan kepadatan berbeda. Jurnal Riset Akuakultur, 2(2):149-156. DOI: 10.15578/JRA.2.2.2007.149-156. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Jusadi D., Gandara E., & Mokoginta I. 2004. Effects of Probiotic Bacillus sp. on Food Convertion and Growth of Catfish Pangasius hypophthalmus. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia, 3(1):15-18. DOI: 10.19027/jai.3.15-18. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Kaligis E., Djokosetiyanto D., & Affandi R. 2009. Pengaruh penambahan kalsium dan salinitas aklimasi terhadap peningkatan sintasan postlarva udang vannamei (Litopenaeus vannamei, Boone). Jurnal Kelautan Nasional, 2(Khusus):101-108. [Google Scholar]
Kholifah U., Trisyani N., & Yuniar I. 2008. Pengaruh padat tebar yang berbeda terhadap kelangsungan hidup dan pertumbuhan pada polikultur udang windu (Penaeus monodon Fab) dan ikan bandeng (Chanos chanos) pada Hapa di tambak Brebes - Jawa Tengah. Neptunus, 14(2):152-158. [Google Scholar]
Lidaenni A. 2008. Pengaruh pemberian bakteri agen biokontrol Vibrio SKT-b dengan dosis yang berbeda terhadap kelangsungan hidup dan pertumbuhan larva udang windu, Penaeus monodon. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Linggarjati K.F., Djunaedi A., & Subagiyo S. 2013. Uji Penggunaan Bacillus sp. sebagai Kandidat Probiotik Untuk Pemeliharaan Rajungan (Portunus sp.). Journal of Marine Research, 2(1):1-6. [Google Scholar]
Mahida. 1993. Pedoman Teknis Budidaya Pakan Alami Ikan dan Udang. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perikanan. Jakarta.
Manik R. & Mintardjo K. 1983. Kolam Ipukan. Dalam Pedoman Pembenihan Udang Penaeid. Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan, Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta.
Mansyur A. & Tangko A.M. 2008. Probiotik: Pemanfaatannya untuk pakan ikan berkualitas rendah. Media Akuakultur, 3(2):145-149. [Google Scholar]
Megahed M.E. 2010. The Effect of Microbial Biofloc on Water Quality, Survival and Growth of the Green Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus) Fed with Different crude Protein Levels I: Sustainable Solution to the Dependency on Fish Oil, Fishmeal and Environmental Problems. Journal of the Arabian Aquaculture Society, 5(2):119-142. [Google Scholar]
Moriarty D.J.W. 1999. Disease Control in Shrimp Aquaculture with Probiotic Bacteria. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology - Microbial Interactions in Aquaculture Disease, 2013: 424123. DOI: 10.1155/2013/424123. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Mudjiman A. & Suyanto S. 1989. Budidaya Udang Windu. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Mulani, Nurbaya, & Atmomarsono M. 2010. Penggunaan probiotik pada pemeliharaan udang windu (Penaeus monodon) dengan dosis pakan yang berbeda. In: Prosiding Forum Inovasi Teknologi Akuakultur, pp. 249-259. [Google Scholar]
Muliani, Nurbaya, Nurhidayah, & Susianingsih E. 2012. Kemampuan bakteri probiotik yang diisolasi dari makroalga terhadap kualitas air dan sintasan udang windu skala laboratorium. Jurnal Riset Akuakultur, 7(1):101-110. [Google Scholar]
Nash G., Poernomo A., & Nash M.B. 1988. Baculovirus infection in brackishwater pond cultured Penaeus monodon fabricius in Indonesia. Aquaculture, 73(1-4):1-6. DOI: 10.1016/0044-8486(88)90035-X. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Nengsih E.A. 2015. Pengaruh aplikasi probiotik terhadap kualitas air dan pertumbuhan udang Litopenaeus vannamei. JURNAL BIOSAINS, 1(1):11-16. [Google Scholar]
Nopitawati T. 2010. Seleksi Bakteri Probiotik dari Saluran Pencernaan untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Pertumbuhan Udang Vaname Litopenaeus vannamei. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. 79 p. [Google Scholar]
Nurhidayah, Tompo A., & Susianingsih E. 2012. Pengelolaan parameter kualitas air di tambak budidaya udang windu dengan aplikasi probiotik, bakterin dan herbal. In: Seminar Nasional Tahunan IX Hasil Penelitian Perikanan dan Kelautan, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta. pp. 1-7.
Pillay T.V.R. & Kutty M.N. 2005. Aquaculture: Principles and Practices. 2nd ed., Blackwell Publishing. Ames, IA, USA. 458-460 p.
Praditia F.P. 2009. Pengaruh Pemberian Bakteri Probiotik Melalui Pakan terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Kelangsungan Hidup Udang Windu Penaeus monodon. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. 52 p. [Google Scholar]
Prihutomo A. 2013. Penilaian Status Kualitas Air Sebagai Dampak Kegiatan Budidaya Udang Vanamei (Litopenaeus vannamei) Intensif dengan Menggunakan Indek Kualitas Air. [Google Scholar]
Purba C.Y. 2012. Performa pertumbuhan, kelulushidupan, dan kandungan nutrisi larva udang vanamei (Litopenaeus vannamei) melalui pemberian pakan artemia produk lokal yang diperkaya dengan sel diatom. Journal of Aquaculture Management and Technology, 1(1):102-115. [Google Scholar]
Ratnawati E. 2008. Budidaya udang windu (Penaeus monodon) sistem semi-intensif pada tambak tanah sulfat masam. Media Akuakultur, 3(1):6-10. DOI: 10.15578/ma.3.1.2008.6-10. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Regals S.Y. 2014. Subtitusi Pakan Berbahan Silase Ikan Dengan Level Berbeda Terhadap Pertumbuhan, FCR Dan Kelulushidupan Benih Udang Vannamei (Litopenaeus vannamei) PL 25-30. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Malang. 78 p. [Google Scholar]
Rochmady R. 2011. Aspek Bioekologi Kerang Lumpur Anodontia edentula (Linnaeus, 1758) (BIVALVIA: LUCINIDAE) Di Perairan Pesisir Kabupaten Muna. Hasanuddin University. Makassar. 183 p. [Google Dcholar]
Rochmady R., Omar S.B.A., & Tandipayuk L.S. 2016. Density of mudclams Anodontia edentula Linnaeus, 1758 relation to enviromental parameters of Muna Regency. In: Prosiding Simposium Nasional Kelautan dan Perikanan III, pp. 149-159, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UBX9G. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Salim A. 2009. Pembenihan Udang Windu Dan Produksi Pakan Alami Di Balai Budidaya Air Payau (BBAP) Ujung Batee Kabupaten Aceh Besar NAD. POLITEKNIK Negeri Jember. Jember.
Sathish Kumar T., Vidya R., Kumar S., Alavandi S.V.V., & Vijayan K.K.K. 2017. Zoea-2 syndrome of Penaeus vannamei in shrimp hatcheries. Aquaculture, 479:759-767. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.07.022. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Sudaryono A. 2006. Kajian kontribusi pakan alami dan buatan serta variasi musim pada performansi pertumbuhan juvenil udang Penaeus monodon yang dipelihara dalam tambak air payau. Aquacultura Indonesiana, 7(2):85-91. [Google Scholar]
Sumeru S.U. & Anna S. 1992. Pakan Udang Windu (Penaeus monodon). Kanisius. Yogyakarta. 88 p. ISBN: 9794137944. [Google Scholar]
Sumianto & Chilmawati D. 2015. Pengaruh probiotik komersial pada pakan buatan terhadap pertumbuhan, efisiensi pemanfaatan pakan, dan kelulushidupan benih Ikan Gurami (Osphronemus gouramu) D35-D75. Jurnal Saintek Perikanan, 11(1):11-16. [Google Scholar]
Supriyono E., Purwanto E., & Utomo N.B.P. 2007. Production of 'Tokolan' White Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in the Cage with Different Rearing Density. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia, 5(1):57-64, DOI: 10.19027/jai.5.57-64. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Susiana S. 2015. Analisis kualitas air ekosistem mangrove di estuari Perancak, Bali. Agrikan: Jurnal Agribisnis dan Perikanan, 8(1):42-49. DOI: 10.29239/j.agrikan.8.1.1-10. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Susiana S. 2011. Diversitas Dan Kerapatan Mangrove, Gastropoda Dan Bivalvia Di Estuari Perancak, Bali. Universitas Hasanuddin. Makassar. 114 p. [Google Scholar]
Susiana S., Niartiningsih A., & Amran M.A. 2014. Hubungan antara kesesuaian kualitas perairan dan kelimpahan kima (Tridacnidae) di Kepulauan Spermonde. Jurnal Pascasarjana UNHAS, 1(April):1-14. [Google Scholar]
Sutanti A. 2009. Pengaruh pemberian bakteri probiotik Vibrio SKT-b melalui Artemia dengan dosis yang berbeda terhadap pertumbuhan dan kelangsungan hidup pasca larva udang windu Penaeus monodon. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. 32 p. [Google Scholar]
Tacon A.G.J. 1987. The nutrition and feeding of farmed fish and shrimp; a training manual. 2: Nutrient sources and composition. [Google Scholar]
Tahe S. & Suwoyo H.S. 2011. Pertumbuhan dan sintasan udang vaname (Litopenaeus vannamei) dengan kombinasi pakan berbeda dalam wadah terkontrol. Jurnal Riset Akuakultur, 6(1):31-40, DOI: 10.15578/jra.6.1.2011.31-40. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Takeuchi T. 1988. Laboratory work-chemical evaluation of dietary nutrients. In: Fish Nutrition and Mariculture, JICA. Tokyo. pp. 179-233. [Google Scholar]
Verschuere L., Heang H., Criel G., Sorgeloos P., & Verstraete W. 2000. Selected bacterial strains protect Artemia spp. from the Pathogenic effects of Vibrio proteolyticus CW8T2. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(3):1139-1146. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.3.1139-1146.2000. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Verschuere L., Rombaut G., Sorgeloos P., & Verstraete W. 2000b. Probiotic Bacteria as Biological Control Agents in Aquaculture. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(4):655-671. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.64.4.655-671.2000. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Wang Y.B., Li J.R., & Lin J. 2008. Probiotics in aquaculture: Challenges and outlook. Aquaculture, 281(1-4):1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.002. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Widagdo P. & Wahjuningrum D. 2014. Oral application of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia, 11(1):54-63. DOI: 10.19027/jai.11.54-63. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Widanarni, Lidaenni M.A., & Wahjuningrum D. 2010. Effects of different doses of skt-b vibrio probiotic bacteria addition on survival and growth rate of tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) larva. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia, 9(1):21-29. DOI: 10.19027/jai.9.21-29. View Article CrossRef [Google Scholar]
Widanarni, Noermala J.I., & Sukenda. 2014. Pemberian prebiotik, probiotik, dan sinbiotik untuk pengendalian ko-infeksi Vibrio harveyi dan infectious myonecrosis virus pada udang vaname Litopenaeus vannamei. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia, 13(1):11-20. DOI: 10.19027/jai.13.11-20. View Article CrossRef
Water quality, phytoplankton composition and growth of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) in an integrated biofloc system with Gracilaria birdiae (Greville) and Gracilaria domingensis (Ktzing)
Bibliographic Information
Cite this article as:
-
Submitted
4 March 2017 -
Revised
3 April 2017 -
Accepted
27 April 2017 -
Published
27 May 2017 -
Version of record
13 July 2017 -
Issue date
31 May 2017
-
Discipline(s)
Fisheries; Fisheries Science
Copyright
Rochmady, Pusat Studi Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93600, Indonesia Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93600, Indonesia.
One of the factors that affect the growth of tiger shrimp is the quality of feed. Nutrient content in feed such as protein, carbohydrate and fat, generally used as a parameter of feed quality. Feed consumed by shrimp is not all digested, one of which depends on the enzymatic ability of the shrimp digestive tract. The use of probiotic bacteria in addition to having the ability to reduce colonies, inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, and neutralize water quality, probiotic bacteria can help digestibility of the intestine.
See Usman & Rochmady.
Copyright © 2017 Ali Usman & Rochmady. Sangia Research Media and Publishing. Production and hosting by Sangia (SRM™). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.