Skip to Main Content Skip to article
Sangia Media
Agrikan: Jurnal Agribisnis Perikanan

Research article
RESPON PENAWARAN KACANG TANAH DI INDONESIA

Under a Creative Commons license

Abstract

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji faktor-faktor apa saja yang mempengaruhi respon penawaran dan elastisitas penawaran kacang tanah di Indonesia. Bentuk respon penawaran adalah Model Nerlove dan teknik estimasinya Ordinary Least Square (OLS) menggunakan Eviews 7. Penelitian menggunakan data time series selama 26 tahun yaitu 1990-2015. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi respon penawaran kacang tanah di Indonesia adalah : harga kacang tanah pada tahun sebelumnya, penawaran kacang tanah pada tahun sebelumnya, harga padi pada tahun sebelumnya, harga kedelai pada tahun sebelumnya, dan produksi kacang tanah pada tahun t. Elastisitas penawaran harga sendiri dalam jangka pendek dan panjang bersifat elastis. Sedangkan elastisitas harga silang terhadap harga padi pada tahun sebelumnya dan terhadap harga kedelai tahun sebelumnya bersifat inelastis.

Keywords

respon penawaran, elastisitas penawaran, kacang tanah

Funding Information

UMMU Ternate

Declarations

License and permission

Creative Commons LicenseThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Publisher's Note

Sangia Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ethical approval acknowledgements

No ethical approval required for this article.

Competing interest

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Supplementary files

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.