Research article
Analysis of Rice Field Agribusiness System in Sidomulyo Village, East Wasile District, East Halmahera Regency
Abstract
This study aims to determine the agribusiness system, production costs, revenue, income, and feasibility of lowland rice farming in Sidomulyo village. The research location was chosen purposively and the sample was taken using the census sampling method, the number of samples taken was 44 respondents. The analysis technique used is descriptive analysis. The results showed that the lowland rice agribusiness system in Sidomulyo village had been running well starting from the upstream agribusiness subsystem in the form of providing production facilities for fertilizers, medicines, seeds and labor. The subsystem of lowland rice farming using the jajar legowo system includes land cultivation, nursery, planting, fertilizing, use of drugs to harvesting. The downstream subsystem of lowland rice farming includes post-harvest and marketing activities. The subsystem of supporting institutions consists of BP3K which routinely provides counseling guidance and cooperative institutions that provide financing loans for lowland rice farmers, production costs per 10,000 m2 in lowland rice farming are Rp. and rice farming income of Rp. 13,595,218, -. Lowland rice farming is feasible, this can be seen from the R/C value > 1.
Keywords
Funding Information
UMMU Ternate
Declarations
License and permission
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Publisher's Note
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna on behalf of Sangia Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ethical approval acknowledgements
No ethical approval required for this article.
Competing interest
No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.
Supplementary files
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References (1)
Amipurba, I. W., & Widiatmi, S. (2018). Perbedaan Usahatani Padi Sehat dan Padi Konvensional (Oriza sativa L.) di Kecamatan Pandak, Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Ilmiah Agritas, 2(1), 59-69.
Andalas, M. S., &Sudrajat, S. (2018). Analisis Komparatif Sistem Pertanian Padi Organik dan Anorganik di Desa Catur Kecamatan Sambi Kabupaten Boyolali. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 7(1).
BPS. (2018). Provinsi Maluku Utara Dalam Angka. CV. Ardhani.
Fauzan, M. (2016). Pendapatan, Risiko, dan Efisiensi Ekonomi Usaha Tani Bawang Merah di Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Agraris. Vol.2 No.2.
Gumbira-Sa’id, E. dan A.H. Intan. (2001). Manajemen Agribisnis. Indonesia:Ghalia.
Pitriyanti, Eni, E., & Triwara, B. S. (2020) Kelayakan Usahatani Padi Semi Organik dan Non Organik di Kabupaten Bantul dalam Bunga Rampai Penelitian Kelayakan Usahatani. K-Media. Yogyakarta.
Rahmawati, N. d. (2017, Juli). Keberanian dalam Mengambil Keputusan dan Risiko oleh Petani Padi Organik di Kabupaten Bantul. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, Vol.3 No.2, 129. doi:https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.3253.
Saragih, Bungaran. 2001. Suara dari Bogor, Membangun Sistem Agribisnis. Penerbit Sucofindo. Bogor.
Soekartawi. (2006). Analisis Usahatani. UI-Press. Jakarta.
Soekartawi. (1995). Analisis Usahatani. UI-Press. Jakarta.
Bibliographic Information
Cite this article as:
-
Submitted
3 June 2021 -
Revised
30 June 2021 -
Accepted
Not available -
Published
22 June 2021 -
Issue date
30 May 2021
-
Discipline(s)
Agriculture
Subject
Copyright
Sangia Advertisement

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.