Research article
The Green Campus Concept using UI GreenMetric for Sports Center Facilities of Universitas Papua Manokwari
Abstract
The present study aims to assess the impact of the green campus score indicator on the development of sports infrastructure at Universitas Papua, Manokwari. The assessment method for implementing a green campus using UI GreenMetric as the criteria met the specified score standard. The analysis findings indicated that the implementation is adequate, following the green campus indicator analysis on the UNIPA Campus's sports center infrastructure. There are only a few indicators that need to be improved in constructing a sports center, such as managing and monitoring development implementation, the use of environmentally friendly tools, managing and monitoring the impacts caused by development activities, and the campus providing regular budgets. In addition, other indicators are thought to have been well field implemented. Based on these findings, a strategy for environmental structuring and green campus infrastructure is required for the UNIPA campus sports center infrastructure. The strategy emphasizes the importance of paying attention to potential threats that may arise as a result of construction, such as environmental damage, the emergence of new residential clusters that do not follow the UNIPA campus, and the emergence of new residential clusters that do not follow the UNIPA campus
Keywords
Funding Information
Univ. Papua
Declarations
License and permission
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Publisher's Note
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna on behalf of Sangia Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Ethical approval acknowledgements
No ethical approval required for this article.
Competing interest
No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.
Supplementary files
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References (29)
Bibliographic Information
Cite this article as:
-
Submitted
19 September 2021 -
Revised
20 March 2022 -
Accepted
Not available -
Published
19 September 2021 -
Issue date
31 October 2021
-
Discipline(s)
Pertanian
Copyright
Sangia Advertisement

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.