Stipwunaraha Media & Publishing Group
Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2018, Pages 41-48 | Cite as
  • Open Access
  • Full Length Articles

Probiotic aplication for growth and survival rate of vaname shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei with different density

1
Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Jl. Letjend Gatot Subroto Km.7, Lasalepa, Muna, Sulawesi Tenggara 93645, Indonesia.
2
Inspektorat Kabupaten Muna, Propinsi Sulawesi Tenggara, Jl. Letjend Gatot Subroto Km.7, Lasalepa, Muna, Sulawesi Tenggara 93600 Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Jl. Letjend Gatot Subroto Km.7, Lasalepa, Muna, Sulawesi Tenggara 93645, Indonesia.
3
Pusat Studi Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil. Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha. Jl. Letjend Gatot Subroto Km.7 Lasalepa, Raha, Sulawesi Tenggara 93645, Indonesia.
4
Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha; Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha, Jl. Letjend Gatot Subroto Km.7, Lasalepa, Muna, Sulawesi Tenggara 93645, Indonesia.
Corresponding Author
https://doi.org/10.29239/j.akuatikisle.2.2.41-48
Open Access
  • 428 views
  • 13 download

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the growth and survival of Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp with the application of probiotics to different stocking densities.  The study was conducted from May to June 2018 at the Balai Benih Ikan Pantai (BBIP) Ghonebalano, Duruka District, Muna Regency, using a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three levels of solid stocking treatment namely treatment A is 18 individu per container, treatment B is 24  individu per container and treatment C is 30  individu per container with three replications.  Data analysis using Variance Analysis (ANOVA) at the confidence level of 95% (α 0.05).  The results showed that the highest daily growth was obtained at 24 individual densities of 5.88% per day, compared to 18 individual densities of 5.86% per day and 30 individual densities of 5.74% per day.  The highest absolute growth is obtained at 24 individual density of 2.43 g per individu, then 18 individual density of 2.15 g per individual, and the lowest at 30 individual density of 2.02 g per individual.  Survival at a density of 18 individual and a density of 24 individual at 88.89%, while a 30-ind density of 86.67%.  Analysis of variance (α 0.05) showed that the application of probiotics to different stocking densities had no significant effect on the daily growth rate of vannamei shrimp (p<0.939), absolute growth of vannamei shrimp (p<0.080), and survival of vannamei shrimp (p<0.744).

Keywords

probiotic growth survival rate different density vannamei shrimp
These keywords were added by the authors and not by machine. This process is static and keywords cannot be updated except using algorithms or other reasons.

Full Text:

Download PDF (1MB) to read the full article text
Note: Downloadable document is available in en

Supplementary files

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, and/or contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding Information

Program Studi Budidaya Perairan, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna Raha

Publisher's Note

Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons International License URL (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

References

Asnawi & Mukhlis2008. Analisis Ekspor Udang Indonesia: Suatu Pendekatan VECM. In: Prosiding International Conference on Regional Networking 2008. vol. d. Banda Aceh. pp. 27–28.

Boyd C.E., 1982. Water quality management for pond fish culture. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.

Boyd C.E., 1991. Water Quality and Aeration in Shrimp Farming, Aurbun University, Alabama. Birmingham Publishing Co. Birmingham, Alabama.

BurhanuddinWahyu F., & Suratman 2016. Aplikasi Probiotik Dengan Kosentrasi Yang Berbeda Terhadap Pertumbuhan Udang Vannamei Litopenaeus Vannamei). OCTOPUS Jurnal Ilmu Perikanan. 5(1):462–465.

Effendie M.I., 1979. Metode Biologi Perikanan. Yayasan Dewi Sri. Bogor, 112 p.

Effendie M.I.I., 1997. Biologi Perikanan. Yayasan Pustaka Nusatama. Yogyakarta, 163 p.

Ekasari J., Hanif Azhar M., Surawidjaja E.H., Nuryati S., De Schryver P., & Bossier P., 2014. Immune response and disease resistance of shrimp fed biofloc grown on different carbon sources. Fish and Shellfish Immunology. 41(2):332–339. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.09.004.

Elovaara A.K., 2003. Shrimp Farming Manual: Practical Technology for Intensive Shrimp Production. United States of America (USA)., 220 p.

Ernawati E., & Rochmady R., 2017. Effect of fertilization and density on the survival rate and growth of post-larva of shrimp vaname (Litopenaues vannamei). Akuatikisle: Jurnal Akuakultur, Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil. 1(1):1–10. DOI: 10.29239/j.akuatikisle.1.1.1-10.

Fegan D.F., 2003. Budidaya Udang Vannamei (Litopenaeus vannamei) di Asia. Gold Coin Indonesia Specialities. Jakarta.

Gunarto & Hendrajat E.A., 2008. Budidaya udang vanamei, Litopenaeus vannamei pola semi-Intensif dengan aplikasi beberapa jenis probiotik komersial. Journal Riset Akuakultur. 3(3):339–349. DOI: 10.15578/JRA.3.3.2008.339-349.

Haliman R.W., & Adijaya D., 2005. Udang vannamei, Pembudidayaan dan Prospek Pasar Udang Putih yang Tahan Penyakit. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta, 1-75 p.

Harefa F., 1996. Pembudidayaan Artemia Untuk Pakan Udang dan Ikan. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.

Herawati V.E., & Hutabarat J., 2015. Analisis pertumbuhan; kelulushidupan dan produksi biomass larva udang vannamei dengan pemberian pakan Artemia sp. produk lokal yang diperkaya Chaetoceros calcitrans dan Skeletonema costatum. Pena Akuatika. 12(1):1–12.

Nengsih E.A., 2015a. Pengaruh aplikasi probiotik terhadap kualitas air dan pertumbuhan udang Litopenaeus vannamei. Jurnal Biosains. 1(1):11–16.

Nengsih E.A., 2015b. Pengaruh aplikasi probiotik terhadap kualitas air dan pertumbuhan udang Litopenaeus vannamei. Jurnal Biosains. 1(1):11–16.

Pandiyan P., Balaraman D., Thirunavukkarasu R., George E.G.J., Subaramaniyan K., Manikkam S., & Sadayappan B., .2013. Probiotics in aquaculture. vol. 5, Drug Invention Today, OMICS International, pp. 55–59.

Partida-Arangure B.O., Luna-González A., Fierro-Coronado J.A., Flores-Miranda C., & González-Ocampo H.A., 2013. Effect of inulin and probiotic bacteria on growth , survival , immune response , and prevalence of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) in Litopenaeus vannamei cultured under laboratory conditions. African Journal Of Biotechnology. 12(21):3366–3375. DOI: 10.5897/AJB12.1569.

Purba C.Y., 2012. Performa pertumbuhan, kelulushidupan, dan kandungan nutrisi larva udang vanamei (Litopenaeus vannamei) melalui pemberian pakan artemia produk lokal yang diperkaya dengan sel diatom. Journal of Aquaculture Management and Technology. 1(1):102–115.

Qi Z., Zhang X.H., Boon N., & Bossier P., 2009. Probiotics in aquaculture of China - Current state, problems and prospect. Aquaculture. 290(1–2):15–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.02.012.

Ratnawati E., 2008. Budidaya udang windu (Penaeus monodon) sistem semi-intensif pada tambak tanah sulfat masam. Media Akuakultur. 3(1):6–10. DOI: 10.15578/ma.3.1.2008.6-10.

Rochmady R., Omar S.B.A., & Tandipayuk L.S., 2016. Density of mudclams Anodontia edentula Linnaeus, 1758 relation to enviromental parameters of Muna regency. In: Simposium Nasional Kelautan dan Perikanan III. pp. 149–159. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3003751. Available: <https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3003751>.

Saoud I.P., Davis D.A., & Rouse D.B., 2003. Suitability studies of inland well waters for Litopenaeus vannamei culture. Aquaculture. 217(1–4):373–383. DOI: 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00418-0.

Supriyono E., Purwanto E., & Utomo N.B.P., 2007. Production of” Tokolan” white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in the cage with different rearing density. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia. 5(1):57–64.

Susianingsih E., Atmomarsono M., & Kurniawan K., 2016. Aplikasi Probiotik Rica 4, 5, dan 3 pada Budidaya Udang Vaname di Tambak yang diaerasi menggunakan Blower Supercharge. In: Prosiding Forum Inovasi Teknologi Akuakultur. pp. 263–269.

Suwoyo H.S., & Mangampa M., 2010. Aplikasi probiotik dengan konsentrasi berbeda pada pemeliharaan udang vaname (Litopenaeus vannamei). In: Prosiding Forum Inovasi Teknologi Akuakultur. pp. 239–247.

Syafaat M.N., Mansyur A., & Tonnek S., 2012. Dinamika kualitas air pada budidaya udang vanname (Litopenaeus vannamei) semi-intensif dengan teknik pergiliran pakan. In: Prosiding Indoaqua-Forum Inovasi Teknologi Akuakultur. pp. 487–494.

Taqwa F.H., 2008. Pengaruh Penambahan Kalium pada Masa Adaptasi Penurunan Salinitas terhadap Performa Pascalarva Udang Vannamei (Litopenaeus vannamei). Institut Pertanian Bogor, 84 p.

Taw N., 2008. Shrimp Culture Technologies. China International Training Course on Technology of Marineculture (Precious Fishes). China: Yiamen Municipial Science & Technology Commission. (September):107–113.

Usman A., & Rochmady R., 2017. Growth and survival of post larvae of tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon Fabr.) through the administration of probiotics with different doses. Akuatikisle: Jurnal Akuakultur, Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil. 1(1):19–26. DOI: 10.29239/j.akuatikisle.1.1.19-26.

Xincai C., & Yongquan S., 2001. Shrimp culture. China International Training Course on Technology of Marineculture (Precious Fishes). China: Yiamen Municipial Science & Technology Commission. :107–113.

Yudiati E., Arifin Z., & Riniatsih I., 2010. Pengaruh aplikasi probiotik terhadap laju sintasan dan pertumbuhan tokolan udang vanamei (Litopeneus vannamei), populasi bakteri vibrio, serta kandungan amoniak dan bahan organik media budidaya. KELAUTAN: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences. 15(3):153–158.

Zonneveld N., Huisman E.A., & Boon J.H., 1991. Prinsip-Prinsip Budidaya Ikan. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta, 317 p.


Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018. Hosting by Stipwunaraha Research Media.

Creative Commons LicenseThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Cite this article as: if using Mendeley click here
Rakhfid, A., Halida, W.O., Rochmady, R., & Fendi, F., 2018. Probiotic aplication for growth and survival rate of vaname shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei with different density. Akuatikisle: Jurnal Akuakultur, Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil 2(2): 41-48. https://doi.org/10.29239/j.akuatikisle.2.2.41-48
  • Revised

    Not available

  • Accepted

    Not available

  • Published

    23 November 2018

  • DOI

    https://doi.org/10.29239/j.akuatikisle.2.2.41-48

  • Publisher Name

    Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Pertanian Wuna

  • Online ISSN

    2598-8298

Subject

  • probiotic
  • growth
  • survival rate
  • different density
  • vannamei shrimp
  • These keywords were added by the authors and not by machine. This process is static and keywords cannot be updated except using algorithms or other reasons.

This article can be traced from

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.